The Tariff Tango
An Analysis of U.S. Tariff Impositions on India & Their Geopolitical Consequences
A Strategic Partnership Under Economic Siege
The U.S.-India relationship, a cornerstone of Indo-Pacific strategy, has been tested by escalating economic friction. This infographic deconstructs the tariff conflict, revealing how trade actions evolved from protectionism to geopolitical coercion, straining a vital partnership.
A Timeline of Conflict: 2018-2025
March 2018: The First Salvo
U.S. imposes global Section 232 tariffs: 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum, citing national security. India is directly impacted.
June 2019: GSP Status Revoked
U.S. terminates India's GSP preferential trade status, affecting over $6.3 Billion in exports and signaling a shift to transactional reciprocity.
June 2019: India Retaliates
India imposes retaliatory tariffs on 28 U.S. products, including almonds and apples, targeting key political constituencies.
June 2023: A False Dawn
A temporary de-escalation sees both nations agree to terminate 6 WTO disputes. India removes retaliatory tariffs.
August 2025: Crisis Point
U.S. invokes IEEPA, imposing a cumulative 50% tariff on most Indian goods, citing India's trade with Russia and triggering a full-blown crisis.
Economic Shockwaves
The 2025 tariff escalation was projected to have a severe macroeconomic impact on India, threatening GDP growth, currency stability, and entire industrial sectors.
-0.8%
Projected GDP Hit
(Morgan Stanley)
$58B+
Annual Trade at Risk
(Approx 1.5% of GDP)
-60%
Potential Export Drop
(Bloomberg Economics)
Record
Pressure on Rupee
(Near record lows)
Vulnerable Indian Sectors
Labor-intensive industries with thin margins faced an existential threat, unable to compete with rivals from lower-tariff nations.
India's Retaliatory Targets
India's 2019 response was a calculated move, targeting U.S. agricultural products to maximize political pressure in key states.
Geopolitical Fallout: A Strained Partnership
The economic conflict inflicted profound strategic damage, undermining decades of trust and cooperation in defense, technology, and regional security.
Defense Ties at Risk
Eroded trust threatened over $20 billion in defense sales and critical co-production deals like the GE F-414 jet engines.
The Quad in Crisis
U.S. actions fractured the narrative of a united democratic front, weakening the Quad's credibility as a counterbalance to China.
Push to Rebalance
Pressure incentivized India to assert its "strategic autonomy," potentially strengthening ties with other powers like Russia and China.
The Weaponization of Trade Law
The U.S. leveraged different legal authorities to escalate the conflict, shifting from broad protectionism to targeted coercion.
Section 232 (1962)
Justification: "National Security Threat" from steel/aluminum imports.
Action: Global tariffs to protect domestic industry.
GSP Withdrawal (1974 Act)
Justification: Lack of "equitable market access" for U.S. goods.
Action: Revoked decades-long duty-free status for India.
IEEPA (1977)
Justification: "Unusual & Extraordinary Threat" (India's Russian oil trade).
Action: Punitive, coercive tariffs to alter foreign policy.
0 Comments